I gave up on it and went to other powder once the new powder was building more tension and was slower compared to the old things. I do not keep in mind if I even attempted regular h4831 or not; I am imagining not.
They are the identical issue, but H4831 sc is Slice shorter so it is going to pack right into a scenario a lot easier then the traditional, and occasionally like our 7mm rem mag it allows us to include extra powder then just the traditional H4831.
What is actually the primary difference? Compression. With no Severe/weighty compression linked to the very long grain 7828, the force curve was altered plus the load fell aside.
243, and a lot of the loads I have started with include, you guessed it, H-4831sc. This time I am likely to shoot the IMR7828 loads initially, followed by the W780 loads just so there won't be any surprises in the event the H-4831sc loads clearly show a shotgun sample! Who appreciates, I just could possibly find a use for it All things considered.
In any case, I realized The 2 kilos of H4831SC made use of the same data, but I didn't know no matter if there was just about anything different between a pound of powder labeled "Intense" and 1 not so labeled. A contact to Hodgdon confirmed which they were being in reality identical and the only change was The brand about the label.
Any load data to help that? My 1st thought is it's not going to burn up the many way and velocities will likely be gradual and all over the place. Might be a nice fireworks Show!
Nampa, Idaho In my expertise the only real actual difference is that the shortcut meters far better as a result of reloading devices. After It really is loaded theres no functional change. I've read that the shortcut can have a small little bit more quickly melt away charge but h4831sc it seems insignificant.
Im under the comprehending I need to use h4831sc. I've study that these powders are identical In addition to the shorter grain dimension with the sc. Need to I however be looking out for h4381sc?
I could stack em in a single gap but I wasn’t content with the velocity. Immediately after months, I obtained lucky and caught some H1000 on the internet and of course compensated a little bit excess. The pretty upcoming week at a gun show a man had a whole circumstance of H1000 for $forty per 1lb. I forget the amount of, h4831sc but With all the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a mild load.
It is amusing how over the years loading plenty of various cartridges in many alternative rifles that I have not attained satisfactory close final results with H-4831 or perhaps the small-cut Model.
I needed a little bit a lot h4831 vs h4831sc more myself so I went in advance and grabbed the 8lb jug to get covered for some time (and have a good amount of exactly the same number of powder).
This is certainly an extreme extruded propellant and gives heightened insensitivity to cold and hot temperatures.
I know the H4831SC presents a far better load density But I feel I have sufficient room in my circumstance for the conventional H4831.
The point that the H4831 is without a doubt a slower burning powder is specifically why you're observing higher velocities acquired with that powder, versus Everything you've viewed Along with the IMR stuff.